The CDE research looked at SETAs and the framework for addressing skills shortages; a survey of constraints to delivery and productivity in the public service; training artisans and JIPSA’s role in the skills revolution.
“South Africa’s skills shortages are not only persisting, but intensifying,” CDE executive director Ann Bernstein said, citing chronic vacancies and poor productivity in the public service and surveys of businesses which repeatedly note the impact of skills shortages on their ability to innovate and grow.
By setting up the Joint Initiative on Priority Skills Acquisition (JIPSA), involving stakeholders in business and organised labour, ten years after a comprehensive strategy was supposed to revolutionise skills delivery the government is accepting an implicit indictment of existing skills development structures and sending a clear message about the slow and uneven progress within and among them.
The research conducted revealed entrenched and serious problems with our efforts to alleviate skills shortages.
Twenty-three SETAs received R4,5 billion last year, almost entirely in the form of levy contributions from 193 000 employers. Since 2002 nearly R20 billion has gone through the SETA system. Few stakeholders are convinced that this money has been spent as well as it could.
The study showed that SETAs are unwieldy and ambitious in scope, burdened with demanding targets – some of which appear to be in conflict with each other. They are pulled in many directions as a result of consensus-driven mandates and myriad failures of the education system to satisfy workplace requirements for basic knowledge.
Learners enter skills training programmes with inadequate grounding in mathematics and communication as well as insufficient skills for learning and poor attitudes about work. Programmes that should be focused on occupational skills and on enabling individuals to play a particular role in the workplace end up performing a wider intervention to attend to foundational learning.
Further, the CDE found that:
- Only 2% of employees in three sectors (finance, chemicals and electricity, gas and water supply) directly benefited from training;
- ‘Scarce’ skills are often so labelled and inflated because of what capacity the SETAs have to provide appropriate training rather than their intrinsic scarcity;
- There is too much focus on low-level training to reach equity targets rather than a more strategic approach to transform the sector.
The public service
Without sufficient skills and productivity, the developmental aspirations of our government will be compromised. Skills are required to deliver essential services like education and health, water and sanitation. Co-ordinating and managing high level policy-making around growth will be similarly endangered.
Key findings from the study
- confirmed and quantified vacancies in national and provincial government departments which the skills shortage prolongs and exacerbates;
- showed that outmoded human resource practices and information management systems are unable to address capacity constraints – skills levels of incumbents are weak, inappropriate, or poorly distributed;
- revealed that too much time is spent on recruitment and not enough on improving productivity;
- uncovered poor succession planning and a worrying ‘juniorisation’ of senior positions.
At the end of December 2006 national and provincial governments alone listed some 321,665 vacant posts; with average annual vacancy rates holding steady at 24.28% (2006), 23.38% (2005), and 25.12% (2004).
The highest vacancy rates occur within the senior management band, with an average of 35% of all posts unfilled; a 59% vacancy rate at deputy director-general level is particularly disturbing says the CDE as is the 42% vacancy rate in middle management. Six out of every ten deputy director general positions remain vacant.
“These vacant posts create instability leading to all sorts of constraints and bottlenecks, including poor oversight, performance management, policy implementation, and interruptions or discontinuous service delivery,” said CDE executive direction, Ann Bernstein.
South Africa suffers from a declining and aging artisan workforce.
- In 1975, 33 000 apprentices were registered in South Africa: by the year 2000 there were only 3 000;
- The average age of artisans is 54 years: in terms of one estimate, 70 per cent of current employed artisans will exit the labour force over the next five to six years;
- JIPSA’s research estimates that South Africa currently produces about 5 000 artisans a year, which will have to rise to 12 500 a year for the next four years to meet demand for a projected increase of 30 000 over the period 2007 to 2010.
The apprenticeship system was associated with the apartheid workplace, and after 1994 many in government felt that artisan skills would be of little importance in the skills base of the ‘new economy’ which was to emerge. Out of a desire to reach employment equity targets and address youth unemployment, most learnerships have been granted to teach low-end skills rather than intermediate, artisan skills.
The research concluded that South Africa needs a high-level coordinating effort with respect to artisans embracing all players: industry bodies, SETAs, the National Skills Authority, the National Skills Fund and FET colleges. Additionally, we should consider reviewing and simplifying training by, inter alia, revisiting apprenticeships and encouraging on-the-job training by reintroducing a learning culture and knowledge transfer in both public and private sector organisations.
JIPSA has brought a welcome focus on the importance of skills for growth. However, by limiting concern to certain ‘priority’ sectors, JIPSA neglects the shortage of well over half a million skilled people linked in part to emigration, underperformance in education and training and economic expansion.
It has a short-term mandate, depends on other skills-development bodies for delivery and is spread across numerous interventions of varying extent and ambition.
“We need radical thinking about reform rather than a mere band-aid solution shoring up a dysfunctional educational system,” said Bernstein.
The roots of our skills shortages go deep in to our system of education and training:
- Education is failing to deliver enough entrants to the training system with the core skills, attitudes and values on which to build workplace skills;
- This education deficit has to be made up by the training system and increasingly by employers themselves;
- The training institutions themselves are bureaucratic, unwieldy and relate poorly to one another; they are burdened with too many distractions from the core business of delivering the workplace skills the economy needs.
In this light we need a thoroughgoing reassessment of our current system and the principles underlying it, in order to craft a realistic, achievable new approach.
According to Bernstein basics of this new approach should include:
- Good training depends on good schooling. The skills development system can only deliver the results the country needs on the basis of a quality revolution in education.;
- We need clarity and new thinking on the roles of the state and other players in education and training. How can the discipline and efficiency of markets play a greater role in both education and training of South Africans? What more can individual companies or sectors in the economy contribute and what incentives can be devised to encourage this expansion? What role can private training enterprises play and how can this be expanded and its reach stretched further?
- We must narrow the mandate of skills training to workplace priorities rather than make the system responsible for a broad range of social and economic outcomes. To burden SETAs (for instance) with targets for sustainable enterprise creation is fantasy. Who believes that short term training is the most important element in founding a sustainable business?
In Bernstein’s view: “South Africa cannot afford to provide a ‘second education’ because our schooling system is not working properly. We need to find a better way of dealing with both education and training, and we need to do this with determination and speed.”